Prison Reduction Initiative for COVID-19 and Emergencies (PRICE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prison Reduction Initiative for COVID-19

and Emergencies (PRICE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Carrier

Criminal Justice program design for:

[CJ 751] Criminal Justice Policy and Planning

April 2021



---------------------

Topic Overview and Problem Summary

            The Prison Reduction Initiative for COVID-19 and Emergencies (PRICE) is a program design made to reduce prison population in the United States. Mass incarceration is defined by Oxford Bibliographies as the current American experiment in incarceration, which is defined by comparatively and historically extreme rates of imprisonment[1] and by the concentration of imprisonment among young, African American men living in neighborhoods of concentrated disadvantages[2]. There is no single reason for prison overcrowding, rather it is reliant on a variety of factors including politics, policies, policing, and economic strategies within impoverished communities. Understanding what mass incarceration is and how it came to be will provide context to complete this program design process.

            The prison population began to grow in the 1970’s when politicians from both parties used fear and thinly veiled racial rhetoric to push increasingly punitive crime control policies[3]. Crime control became a hot topic in U.S. politics, and both the Democrat and Republican parties were determined to win the spotlight. In 1971, the Republican party claimed the first of these efforts as President Nixon declared the War on Drugs. This was a global campaign led by the U.S. with military aid and intervention on drug and gang/cartel prohibition. The goal of the War on Drugs was to reduce the illegal drug trade in the U.S. by at least 60%. By reducing drug trade, overall crime statistics were also expected to go down. However, the actions of the War on Drugs hurt domestically more than anywhere else. Two presidents after Nixon, President Reagan continued the campaign in daring fashion. The U.S. prison population almost doubled in Reagan’s eight years as president[4]. Following the end of the War on Drugs, it was the Democratic party’s turn to strike. The 1994 Crime Bill: Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act was passed under the leadership of President Clinton. The bill gave states funding to enact “tough on crime” policies that gave further rise to prison populations[5]. The War on Drugs and 1994 Crime Bill exploded the U.S. prison population by focusing on punitive justice rather than rehabilitation in the correctional setting. Policies that channeled this ideology included[6]:

·       Three Strikes Laws – mandated a sentence of 25 years to life after conviction of an individual’s third felony

·       Mandatory Minimum Sentencing – laws that dictate minimum sentencing strip judges of the ability to account for individual circumstances

·       Problematic probation and parole – strict rules regarding probation and parole cause many people to be sent back to prison for minor violations

·       Private prisons leading to profit motive – private prisons and a vast number of private vendors are financially incentivized to maintain mass incarceration

Because of the various policies and motives generated throughout the years, prison overcrowding had become a substantial problem in the criminal justice system. The United States is one of the top countries in the world for number of people incarcerated and for money spent on incarcerated individuals. In fact, the U.S. incarcerates the most people per capita than any other nation at 655 people per 100,000. The U.S. spends almost $182 billion USD ever year, while incarcerating nearly 1% of the world’s adult population[7]. The term mass incarceration was coined to help explain this irregular phenomenon, and recent political action has been taken to reduce the prison population in the U.S. However, the problem is still at its peak, and recent global events have shown a new level of importance in reducing the prison population.

            The COVID-19 pandemic is an ongoing global pandemic of the coronavirus disease, consisting of severe acute respiratory complications. COVID-19 is spread easily between individuals through respiratory droplets produced by coughing, sneezing, laughing, and talking[8]. The droplets, depending on their size, can stay in the air and be inhaled by nearby individuals, or land on a surface in which the virus will live up to three days or more. Anyone who touches an infected surface and then touches their face, especially their eyes, mouth, and nose, can contract the virus. Obviously, this can pose as a huge issue for incarcerated individuals, especially in the growing number of prisons that are overpopulated. Prisons are one of the worst places to be with a virus such as COVID-19, solely due to the number of individuals confined to one space and the amount of rotation between shared spaces[9]. Prisoners are frequently transferred from cells, jail yards, cafeteria, facilities, and more. When someone is convicted of a crime and sent to prison, that person could have been exposed on the outside and now have brought COVID-19 into the prison. Additionally, the constant rotation of guards within the facility go home every single day. They usually interact with their family, and even if they do not leave their house, their family has likely interacted with others outside of the house. If any of the guards were to contract COVID-19 on the outside and bring it back to the facility, this would pose a significant threat to the prison’s population[10]. Prisons have taken steps to help prevent the spread of the virus, including cancelling visitors from the outside, sanitize routinely, and enlist guidelines to address the pandemic. However, it is practically useless when considering the amount of movement and direct contact prisoners have with each other and with the guards. Reducing prison populations, starting with those most vulnerable to COVID-19, is a key element to protecting the sanctity of justice, and is a starting point to ending mass incarceration.

 

 

---------------------

Target Population

The PRICE program will focus its target population on state prisoners only.

Current state prison population in the U.S.: 1,300,000.

Prisoners assisted through PRICE (minimum): 150,500 / 3 years of operation (including PAC year[11])

Primary Target Population: the first population that will be affected by this program (PAC year & beyond)

·       Elderly [20,000 limit + minimum eligibility][12]

o   65+ years old[13]

·       Critically ill, imminent death [no limit + minimum eligibility]

o   Current illness (ex. pneumonia, cancer)

·       Organ transplant patients [no limit + minimum eligibility]

·       Immunocompromised [100,000 + minimum eligibility]

o   HIV/AIDS[14]

o   Heart disease, lung disease, etc.

o   Currently has a specific immune system disease (ex. congenital IgA[15])

Secondary Target Population: the second population that will be affected by this program (1 ½  year & beyond)

·       Previous critical illness [30,000 + minimum eligibility]

o   Ex. cancer survivor

o   Recovered from critical illness past 6 months

·       Pregnant women [500 + minimum eligibility][16]

o   Any stage of pregnancy

Minimum Eligibility:

·       Primary Target Population must not be previously sentenced to

o   Capital Punishment

o   Life without possibility of parole

·       Secondary Target Population must not be convicted of an offense involving

o   Homicide (murder, manslaughter)

o   Rape/sexual assault

o   Arson

o   Assault with a deadly weapon

o   Weapons (use in act for violent, property, or drug)

Minimum Eligibility Discretionary Case Guidelines:

Good behavior set upon as currently defined, absolutely necessary for consideration of immediate or delayed parole upon program completion.

If parole is violated, individual will immediately be disqualified from the program and serve the original full sentence in prison +3 months for parole violation, +6 months if crime is committed as/during parole violation plus sentence of crime.

Highest offense counted: i.e. intoxication during armed robbery not applicable to Drug category, applicable to Violent crime/Weapons use category

·       Homicide, Rape/Sexual Assault, Arson ONLY applies to Primary Target Population

o   Age 65+ must have served 2/3 years minimum of their total sentence

§  Fully/Partially restricted house arrest 1 year (or remainder of sentence if >1 year)

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

§  Must enter rehabilitation program (unspecified)

o   Age 40-64 must have served 2/3 years minimum of their total sentence

§  Fully restricted house arrest 6 months (or remainder of sentence if >6 months)

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion unlikely

§  Possibility of delayed parole upon further sentencing serve likely

§  Must enter rehabilitation program (unspecified)

o   Age 18-39 must have served 1/3 years minimum of their total sentence

§  Fully restricted house arrest 6 months (or remainder of sentence if >6 months)

§  No possibility of full parole upon program completion

§  Possibility of delayed parole upon further sentencing serve unlikely

§  Must enter rehabilitation program (unspecified)

·      Assault with a deadly weapon, Weapons (use in act for violent, property, or drug) ONLY applies to Primary Target Population

o   Age 65+ must have served 1/3 years minimum of their total sentence

§  Partially restricted house arrest 1 year (or remainder of sentence if >1 year)

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

§  Must enter rehabilitation program (unspecified)

o   Age 40-64 must have served 2/3 years minimum of their total sentence

§  Fully/Partially restricted house arrest 6 months (or remainder of sentence if >6 months)

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

§  Must enter rehabilitation program (unspecified)

o   Age 18-39 must have served 1/3 years minimum of their total sentence

§  Fully/Partially restricted house arrest 6 months (or remainder of sentence if >6 months)

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion unlikely

§  Possibility of delayed parole upon further sentencing serve likely

§  Must enter rehabilitation program (unspecified)

·       Assault

o   Age [any] must serve partial house arrest for remainder of sentence if >1 year + retain probationary period OR enter and successfully complete anger management program and courts will dismiss probationary period

o   If remaining sentence is <1 year, 6 months partial house arrest + return to prison OR 6 months partial house arrest + enter and successfully complete anger management program and courts will dismiss probationary period

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

·       Weapons (possession), Property (w/o weapon use)

o   Age [any] must serve partial house arrest for remainder of sentence if >1 year + retain probationary period

o   If remaining sentence is <1 year, 4 months partial house arrest

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

·       Drug (use/distribution)

o   Age [any] must serve partial house arrest for remainder of sentence if >1 year + retain probationary period OR enter and successfully complete drug rehabilitation program and courts will dismiss probationary period

o   If remaining sentence is <1 year, 4 months partial house arrest

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

·       All other minor offenses, Drug possession and misdemeanor drug use, etc.

o   Age [any] must serve partial house arrest for remainder of sentence if >1 year + retain probationary period OR enter and successfully complete drug rehabilitation program and courts will dismiss probationary period

o   If remaining sentence is <1 year, 4 months partial house arrest

§  Possibility of full parole upon program completion likely

Parole Information:

Full House Arrest- home incarceration

Partial House Arrest- home confinement/curfew

Full/Partial House Arrest- parole board decision

PRICE sets guidelines for Full and Partial House Arrest based on empirical research and general parole procedures[17][18]. Full/Partial House Arrest is noted for groups of individuals who may receive either. These guidelines are set to protect the PRICE program and the community, to prevent miscommunication or misinformation in parole board decisions that could result in negative outcomes.

EVERY PRISONER MUST SEE THE STATE PAROLE BOARD FOR SPECIFIC GUIDELINES AND FINAL DETERMINATION BEFORE RELEASE.

 

 

 ---------------------

Awareness, Selection, & Screening

An initial PRICE Program Awareness Campaign (PAC) to spread the program information to state prisons across the U.S. will be funded to last around one (1) year. The PRICE PAC will reach out to State political officials for networking and state prison administrations for an initial information session. In this meeting, PRICE PAC will notify the State and state prisons of the specific program details, costs, and dedicated comprehensive support for those facilities that wish to participate. The average state prisoner in 45 states across the U.S. costs $33,300[19]. Participation in the program could reduce both annual cost and prison population of the facility. If the administration is interested in the program, a formal meeting will take place between PRICE officials and the state prison administration to review and sign legal proceedings. There will be no limit to amount of state prisons per State that can participate in the program. More state prisons may join the program  after the one-year PAC.

Stage 1, RECRUITMENT. All prisoners must qualify under one of the two Target Population groups. To be recruited to the program, prisons*, prisoners or their representative (lawyer, guardian, doctor/nurse, etc.) must provide the program valid medical documentation that will satisfy the criteria of one or both of the two Target Population groups. This documentation will be verified by medical and legal professionals and signed by the PRICE staging committee to advance the prisoner to Stage 2.

Stage 2, SCREENING. The prisoner must pass a risk/needs assessment conducted and verified by the rehabilitation committee[20]. From there, all qualifying prisoners must satisfy both Minimum Eligibility and corresponding Discretionary Case Guidelines. To successfully complete the screening process, prisons[21], prisoners or their representative (lawyer, guardian, doctor/nurse, etc.) must provide the program valid court documentation regarding their case. The PRICE staging committee will review the prisoner’s case details and verify the accuracy with the courts. Any significant fabrications or misleading details in initial documentation will result in automatic disqualification of the prisoner from the program. If a prisoner is selected to the screening process and cannot organize valid court documentation for financial or other reasons, the prisoner must submit a letter to PRICE regarding this information; the PRICE staging committee will review the court case information separately. If a recruited prisoner successfully passes the screening committee’s qualifications, they will be entered into one of two selection pools (Target Population) depending on their medical status.

Stage 3, SELECTION. All qualifying prisoners at this point have been verified to have a medical condition that meets one of the two Target Population groups and have met the Minimum Eligibility and corresponding Discretionary Case Guidelines. Qualifying prisoners will be placed in their selection groups based on the highest significant medical status. Example: if a prisoner had pneumonia 3 months ago but is an organ transplant patient (either former or current), they will be placed in the Primary Target Population. If it was just that they had pneumonia 3 months ago, they will be placed in the Secondary Target Population. The PRICE staging committee will choose individuals from their respective groups based on the order in which they were placed into a Target Population.

 

 

 ---------------------

Program Components

PRICE Committee’s:

Board of Directors/Administration

Runs the daily operations of PRICE, sets goals and objectives, handles finances, employment, and all other administrative duties as assigned. Evaluates program monthly to determine effectiveness of program and provide comprehensive summary of results to top officials and funding partners. The original committee of PRICE, operates or organizes the hiring of independent operators of the one-year PRICE PAC.

Key staff-Chief Executive Operator: maintains operational efficacy and the face of the program; facilitates weekly meetings between directors; keeps program on track towards goals and objectives while changing/creating goals and objectives; makes desired outcomes clear and concise; organizes program-wide meetings and events; manages funding partner relationships; assists in digesting monthly evaluations of program.

Staging

Runs the three stages of intake: Recruiting, Screening, and Selection. Follows specific guidelines set by the PRICE program for prisoner intake. Conducts the initial risks/needs assessment for applicants to the program[22]. Works closely with professionals in the legal and medical profession; members may be experienced in the legal and medical profession. Keeps clear and documented communication with prison administration, parole board, and parole committee on prisoner placement and parole recommendation.

Key staff-Staging Director: will have enhanced knowledge in the legal/medical profession as to provide insight and organize meetings to determine placement of prisoners; primary communicator between committee and Board of Directors.

Parole

Works closely with legal professionals and the staging committee to determine appropriate parole guidelines. Works closely with state parole board to determine precise guidelines that work for the prison, PRICE program, and prisoner. Sets appointments for individuals to receive a vaccination to fulfill one of the three key Parole COVID-19 Requirements. Mandates house arrest and quarantine guidelines to fulfill one of the three key Parole COVID-19 Requirements. Works closely with local law enforcement, documents confirmed communication to local law enforcement for prisoners deemed dangerous by a full house arrest status or state parole board. For prisoners on temporary parole, the parole committee determines the length of temporary parole based on the Minimum Eligibility Discretionary Case Guidelines and the transfer of prisoner back to the state prison. For prisoners on designated parole and prisoners moving to a probationary period, parole committee documents communication to state prison and the courts, either who will designate further procedures for the prisoner once their parole sentence has been fulfilled.

STATE PRISONS AGREE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF THE PAROLE COMMITTEE, THROUGH APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ASSIGNING SPECIFIC PAROLE OFFICERS/ORGANIZATIONS TO INMATES.

Key staff-Parole Director: experienced in corrections to provide familiar insight towards the committee; asserts parole guidelines are clear and concise to parole officer and prisoner; confirms that all guidelines for parole will be followed; maintains documented communication between state parole board, courts, and local law enforcement; determines if specific prisoners need extra attention; primary communicator between committee and Board of Directors.

Rehabilitation

Responsible for organizing and entering prisoner into a rehabilitation program that fits the Minimum Eligibility Discretionary Case Guidelines and a risk/needs assessment. Prisoners with lesser charges may have the option to choose a rehabilitation program to exchange part of their sentence or the way in which it is served. It is the sole duty of the rehabilitation committee to provide adequate choice to the prisoner for rehabilitation programs based on their crimes. Documenting the decisions made in this process is crucial to keeping track of an individual’s sentence, and documentation of the program progress is crucial to evaluating it as a viable option for the PRICE program.

Key staff- Rehabilitation Director: understands corrections and the need for a rehabilitative approach; understands the various rehabilitation programs and what they can offer to specific individuals; understands the Minimum Eligibility Discretionary Case Guidelines and how to organize committee around intervention within such guidelines; have a system of communications and documentation for prisoner program-entry and program progress; provide insight to the Board of Directors on successful or unsuccessful programs, policies, or prisoner parole guidelines; primary communicator between committee and Board of Directors.

Parole COVID-19 Requirements:

These are specific requirements for prisoners who are participating in the PRICE program. These individuals are being released on either temporary or full parole because of their medical condition in the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of this, these individuals will be required to adhere to the following:

·       Vaccine

Required to receive any of the current or future available COVID-19 vaccinations. The vaccination must occur within the first two months of parole and will be assigned by the PRICE parole committee.

·       Quarantine

All individuals are required to follow basic quarantine guidelines as asserted by the CDC, even if on partial house arrest (home confinement/curfew). Prisoners are being conditionally released for medical reasons regarding their safety in the COVID-19 pandemic. Home quarantine is meant to be the safer option as opposed to prison. Prisoners will be notified of this and the immediate punishment that will befall on them if parole guidelines are broken. There are no second chances!

·       Rehabilitation

Depending on offender status based on the Minimum Eligibility Discretionary Case Guidelines, an individual may be required to or optionally decide to attend a rehabilitation program. The PRICE rehabilitation committee oversees this movement and program placement.

 


 ---------------------

Offender Risks/Needs Assessment

There will be a risks/needs assessment for applicants and participants of the PRICE program. The assessment will be held by the rehabilitation committee to determine if the individual is a significant threat to themselves or to others. This assessment will be formatted similar to federal prison system risks/needs assessments[23], and will look for similarities in the state corrections assessment that was conducted upon the prisoner’s arrival, or, if arrival was within 6 months, use the state corrections assessment as is. If there was no state corrections assessment, the rehabilitation committee will compare the results with other in-state prison risks/needs assessments. The rehabilitation committee will confirm or deny participation in the program. If the prisoner is not deemed a threat to themselves or others based on the assessment, they may continue with the staging committee to be entered into PRICE. The rehabilitation committee will use the assessment to determine a specific rehabilitation program if the offender is required to be placed in one, or chooses to be entered in one. Any offender may submit a request for a specific rehabilitative program, but admission to that program is not guaranteed depending on risk/needs assessment and the program capacity at that time.

 

 

 ---------------------

Program Completion

An offender is considered “complete” from this program when they are either

            a) released on probation

            b) sent back to prison

            c) die of natural/other causes

An offender that disqualifies themselves from the program is not considered a part of the “complete” statistic and is instead counted towards the “regression” statistic. The PRICE program expects a 95% complete statistic in the first 3 years (including PAC year), with regression falling no higher than 20%.

 

 

 ---------------------

A Note from the Creator

Participation in this program is completely voluntary, though strict guidelines will be enforced to keep offenders from taking advantage of an already advantageous opportunity. This program is not like compassionate release, it is meant to be an alleviation on the overcrowded United States prison system in the time of a global pandemic. The COVID-19 virus is unlike many virus’s civilization has seen in its past, and extra caution is needed to protect the lives of everyone. It is morally irresponsible, arguably even negligent, to let hundreds of thousands of people sit in overcrowded prisons with pre-existing conditions that can very easily become fatal if they contract COVID-19. The virus feeds off groups of contained individuals, making prisons a death trap for those who may already be too weak to withstand it. Mass incarceration has been a problem for some time now, but emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic give us an opportunity to reflect on our systems and policies. Not only that, but this program saves money. Lots of it. The average state prisoner costs the hardworking taxpayer $33,300 annually. If this program reaches its minimum projections, we are looking at saving $3.5 billion per year. Support for this program will result in lives and money saved, a win-win if you ask me. It will help us turn the United States criminal justice system away from punitive justice and back towards effective rehabilitation practices. America is known for being the best country in so many aspects, we cannot let incarceration be our weak spot. Support the Prison Reduction Initiative for COVID-19 and Emergencies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ---------------------

References

Beck, A.J.; Blumstein, A. (2018). Racial Disproportionality in U.S. State Prisons: Accounting for the Effects of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Criminal Involvement, Arrests, Sentencing, and Time Served. J Quant Criminol 34, 853–883. Doi: 10.1007/s10940-017-9357-6

Cullen, J. (2018, July 20). The History of Mass Incarceration. Brennan Center for Justice. The History of Mass Incarceration | Brennan Center for Justice

FairFightInitiavtive.org. (2021, February 12). The History, Causes, and Facts on Mass Incarceration. Fair Fight Initiative. The History, Causes, and Facts on Mass Incarceration (fairfightinitiative.org)

James, N. (2018). Risk and Needs Assessment in the Federal Prison System. Congressional Research Service. Risk-and-Needs-Assessment-in-the-Federal.pdf (justiceroundtable.org)

Kratcoski P.C.; Dunn Kratcoski L.; Kratcoski P.C. (2020) Parole and Community Supervision. In: Juvenile Delinquency. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31452-1_15

 

Maruschak, L.A.; Bronson, J. (2017) HIV in Prisons, 2015-Statistical Tables. U.S. Department of Justice (BoJS). HIV in Prisons, 2015 - Statistical Tables (bjs.gov)

 

Ofer, U. (2019, June 4). How the 1994 Crime Bill Fed the Mass Incarceration Crisis. ACLU. American Civil Liberties Union (aclu.org)

 

OxfordBibliographies.com. (2012). Mass Incarceration. Criminology. Doi: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0033

 

Park, K.; Meagher, T. (2021, April 23). Coronavirus in Prisons. The Marshall Project. A State-by-State Look at Coronavirus in Prisons | The Marshall Project

 

Saloner B; Parish K; Ward J.A.; DiLaura G; Dolovich S. (2020) COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in Federal and State Prisons. JAMA. 324(6):602–603. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12528

Sawyer, W.; Wagner, P. (2020, March 4). Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2020. Prison Policy Initiative. Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2020 | Prison Policy Initiative

 

Welsh, W.; Harris, P. (2015). Criminal Justice Policy and Planning, 5th Edition. New York City: Routledge.

White, M. (2020, August 24). What is house arrest and how does it work? Felonies.org What Is House Arrest and How Does It Work? | Felonies.org

 

Widra, E. (2020, May 11). Since you asked: How many people aged 55 or older are in prison, by state? Prison Policy Initiative. Since you asked: How many people aged 55 or older are in prison, by state? | Prison Policy Initiative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Information Sites

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | CDC

 

General Information for Immunocompromised Persons | Cryptosporidium | Parasites | CDC

 

Pregnancy in Prison Statistics (PIPS) | The Project (arrwip.org)

Risk for COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death By Age Group | CDC

The Price of Prisons - The Price of Prisons - Prison spending in 2015 | Vera Institute

 



[1] OxfordBibliographies.com. (2012). Mass Incarceration. Criminology. Doi: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0033

[2] Beck, A.J.; Blumstein, A. (2018). Racial Disproportionality in U.S. State Prisons: Accounting for the Effects of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Criminal Involvement, Arrests, Sentencing, and Time Served. J Quant Criminol 34, 853–883. Doi: 10.1007/s10940-017-9357-6

[3] Cullen, J. (2018, July 20). The History of Mass Incarceration. Brennan Center for Justice. The History of Mass Incarceration | Brennan Center for Justice

[4] Cullen, J. (2018)

[5] Ofer, U. (2019, June 4). How the 1994 Crime Bill Fed the Mass Incarceration Crisis. ACLU. How the 1994 Crime Bill Fed the Mass Incarceration Crisis | American Civil Liberties Union (aclu.org)

[6] FairFightInitiavtive.org. (2021, February 12). The History, Causes, and Facts on Mass Incarceration. Fair Fight Initiative. The History, Causes, and Facts on Mass Incarceration (fairfightinitiative.org)

[7] Sawyer, W.; Wagner, P. (2020, March 4). Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2020. Prison Policy Initiative. Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2020 | Prison Policy Initiative

[9] Park, K.; Meagher, T. (2021, April 23). Coronavirus in Prisons. The Marshall Project. A State-by-State Look at Coronavirus in Prisons | The Marshall Project

[10] Saloner B; Parish K; Ward J.A.; DiLaura G; Dolovich S. (2020) COVID-19 Cases and Deaths in Federal and State Prisons. JAMA. 324(6):602–603. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12528

[11] See Awareness, Selection, and Screening on Page 6

[12] Widra, E. (2020, May 11). Since you asked: How many people aged 55 or older are in prison, by state? Prison Policy Initiative. Since you asked: How many people aged 55 or older are in prison, by state? | Prison Policy Initiative

[14] Maruschak, L.A.; Bronson, J. (2017) HIV in Prisons, 2015-Statistical Tables. U.S. Department of Justice (BoJS). HIV in Prisons, 2015 - Statistical Tables (bjs.gov)

[17] Kratcoski P.C.; Dunn Kratcoski L.; Kratcoski P.C. (2020) Parole and Community Supervision. In: Juvenile Delinquency. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31452-1_15

[18] White, M. (2020, August 24). What is house arrest and how does it work? Felonies.org What Is House Arrest and How Does It Work? | Felonies.org

[20] See Offender Risks/Needs Assessment on Page 9-10.

[21] *Inmates may ask the prison administration to assist in referral to the PRICE program. Prisons will be asked to help inmates with this request as a part of the federal government’s effort to reduce mass incarceration (assuming federal funding is granted).

[22] See Offender Risks/Needs Assessment on Page 9-10.

[23] James, N. (2018). Risk and Needs Assessment in the Federal Prison System. Congressional Research Service. Risk-and-Needs-Assessment-in-the-Federal.pdf (justiceroundtable.org)

Comments